what do you think about sexualization of pokemon species. Some historical antecedents?
I’m afraid I don’t really know what you mean by “historical antecedents” in this context… do you mean like bestiality in mythology? I’m not by any means well-informed about world mythology generally; I would only consider myself an expert on Greco-Roman myth, and I think what’s going on there is a very different sort of phenomenon. When Pokémon are portrayed in a sexualised manner in fan art and the like, that tends to involve accentuating their human-like traits, particularly feminine ones. The most important cases in Greek mythology involve a male god in the form of an animal (or in the case of Pasiphaë a male animal and a human woman under the power of a god), and make no effort to humanise the animal form in any way. I think the point there is probably something about humans being at the mercy of nature and the divine, ’cause sex is almost always about dominance in Greek culture, and the exemption of deities from human rules and social norms.
A different sort of case again, where a non-human thing does have its human traits emphasised and sexualised, would be creatures like mermaids, and in folklore those tend to be seen as devilish temptresses who are out to kill men, like rusalkas in Slavic myth, so those are about the dangers of temptation and, essentially, a fear of female sexuality. With Pokémon the human is imagined as being emphatically in charge, and the Pokémon are probably in a position where they will habitually seek their trainers’ approval… which makes the whole thing a bit icky the way I see it, in the same way as sexual relationships with children (particularly between teachers and students) are icky.
I just wanted to let you know that I think your Pokemon/game of thrones house mottos are fantastic XD
Aww, thanks. Almost on the home stretch now!
What do you think of the theory that the Rowlet line will be grass/steel, the Litten line fire/poison, and the Popplio line water/fairy, to tie into potential themes of knife-thrower, fire-breather, and clown/entertainer-seal?
Pretty much the same thing as I think of most of these predictions that people like to make in the run-up to a new generation: “It could be right; it’s probably wrong; there’s too little evidence to make a good assessment; I don’t really care.”
What’s your explanation for how the move Trick-or-Treat works?
Hmm. Well, when you go Trick-or-Treat-ing, you “become” a ghost, or monster, or whatever, for a little while. You take a little journey into the spirit world, and gain new perspectives on the natural and the supernatural. Pumpkaboo is a Jack-o’-lantern, a light that guides souls through the spirit world, so it makes sense it would be able to get other Pokémon to follow it on that sort of escapade. Once you go along with that, you have some of the properties of a spirit yourself, including immunities and vulnerabilities.
Re: Litten, it might only be black because of its fur being so oily as it says on the official website, and not the typical ‘black=dark’ thing. If they’re going with the bomb/explosion motif, and if the marking on its head really is based on the symbol for brimstone and not just random stripes, we could see something totally weird like Fire/Steel or even Fire/Rock.
Eh, I think they’re likely to stay away from “totally weird” on the starters; they want starters to have broad appeal, rather than be quirky and niche. But sure, rule nothing out. As always, I am the very soul of apathy as far as predicting things about upcoming games.
“Burst evolutions” is really cringy and awful. Please go into the future and tell me that’s not happening.
Well, seeing as you wrote this a couple of weeks ago and I am only now getting around to it (it’s been a hectic month), I can now report to you, from the future, that it is not happening. Yet.
Why do you think Hurricane’s a Flying attack but Twister a Dragon attack?
I suppose probably because Twister is in some sense a “magical” attack, in a similar way to Fairy Wind, while Hurricane is notionally about wind created purely by the force of one’s wings. Why does that matter? I suspect there’s probably not a satisfying answer.
Do you have any Pokémon fan theories you are particularly fond of? If so, what are some of them? Would love to hear what theories a Pokémaniac such as yourself find intriguing! 😀
Other than my own? 😉 Heh. No, that’s a joke; mine are a load of nonsense (just browse for a while, especially the anime commentaries). But yeah, I don’t know… I don’t really go out of my way to look for these, and my reaction to a lot of them is “well, sure, if you like?” I’m quite fond of the whole Venonat/Butterfree mix-up thing, purely because I think it’s one of the few bits of wild internet speculation that might actually be true. Beyond that, though, mostly I just really enjoy the thought processes that go into some of the really dark interpretations of little details of the game, like the story that got built up around Blue’s Raticate dying on the S.S. Anne. It’s going way further than I think you can take the creators’ intentions, but it’s interesting enough in its own right to be a lot of fun.
Now that there’s more info on Pokemon go, could we have your thoughts?
Okay well number 1 they just announced they’re recruiting beta testers back home in New Zealand and GOD DAMN IT WHY DID I MOVE TO THIS RIDICULOUS BACKWARDS LITTLE COUNTRY
Continue reading “Anonymous asks:”