A youtuber named ProtoMario made a video called “Do Pokeballs brainwash pokemon true.” They talk about pokeballs being tied to the trainer. My problem with this theory is that like Stockholm syndrome, pokemon’s ability to choose isn’t acknowledged. It’s a fallacy in my opinion. Let alone using the anime, which makes it obvious they are not. Game allows some liberties I could understand. But anyway I really wonder if most game theorists honestly think critically reexamine their own theories.

Okay, let’s watch this thing…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sE6Xs0zWfq0&list=PLRhGZdZiftIdHMA2zWL1DqOSYNO4npnoh&index=65

Okay, that… just…

…most of the evidence this video presents goes against the thesis it’s arguing!  ”Pokémon sometimes disobey their trainers’ orders, therefore captured Pokémon are brainwashed”?  Good grief!  I would go through this point-by-point but I honestly don’t think it’s worth it; they assume the conclusion they’re supposed to be arguing, and then interpret the evidence in the light of what they already believe.  Any child can do that.

I read the worst pokemon list that you wrote… A LONG time ago. Remember Kricketune and Perish Song? Apparently you aren’t the only trainer that hates Kricketune– A trainer in pokemon centers around Sinnoh that you can battle every now and then uses Kricketune as his party– Just Kricketune. As soon as the battle starts, he uses Perish Song, killing his only pokemon in three turns. I’m of the belief that the only reason he battles is to faint his dumb pokemon.

Death is too good for Kricketune and his moustache.

I saw a few recent questions about some of the “god” (well, your thoughts on them), and I thought I’d pick your mind on one of the ones that has baffled me since I first saw it: Giratina. Dialga is time, Palkia is space, and Giratina is… Antimatter? I mean, I know what antimatter is (to an extent, I mean, even scientists are trying to figure that one out), but what exactly is Giratina’s function? What is the “Reverse World”? What do you think would happen if he no longer existed?

The way Giratina is described in Diamond and Pearl always had me thinking of it as a death god figure, kind of like Hades in Greek mythology – dark and terrifying, but not actually evil, and in fact vital to the maintenance of cosmic order.  The way Platinum portrays it (mostly in Cynthia’s speculation) seems to be saying that Giratina basically maintains the Distortion World as a ‘photo negative’ of the real world that can be used to restore any damage done to it on a cosmic level, which is why Cyrus’ attempts to take apart reality in Platinum fail.  If memory serves, the game uses the analogy of DNA, which has a similar system going on (errors can be detected because the two strands no longer match up right).  As for what would happen if the Distortion World no longer existed… well, I think that’s asking the wrong question.  Logically, it would be possible to use the ‘real’ world to repair or rebuild the Distortion World in just the same way.  The only way to destroy one would be to take apart both at the same time (as Cyrus attempts to do).

Basically, Giratina is kind of important for maintaining the stability of reality, as the caretaker of the Distortion World.  The Pokédex says that it was “banished for its violence” but I actually don’t think that’s true, because Arceus (presumably) has given it a vital role in the cosmology of the Pokémon universe.  Of course, as frightening as Giratina is, it makes sense that humans who encountered it might get the wrong idea about its nature and powers, hence the whole ‘death god’ thing.

I think most people expect Nintendo’s next release to be a R/S/E remake for the 3DS. Your thoughts? I, for one, would be dancing in the streets if this came true!

I wouldn’t know about ‘most people,’ but the games could certainly do with being brought up to date – it would be nice to play through those old stories with the mechanical changes from generations 4 through 6.  As long as they didn’t just redo the stories without any new content, it could be good.  I don’t think I’d be ‘dancing in the streets’; remakes are kinda neat but they’re all about the execution.  I’d probably buy it, though.

What would your moveset look like if you were a Pokemon? Would you set up spikes? Try to sweep? Stall with toxic and protect? Would you want a moveset based on competitive functionality or for theme and flavor? You could talk about which 4 moves would you like or possibly what you would learn as you leveled up

Rest because f#$% mornings

Teleport because f#$% walking

Hypnosis because f#$% social interaction

Hyper Beam because f#$% everything

What if Dialga has a less control oriented relationship with time? In Mystery Dungeon Time and Darkness, the games sorta explore the different relationships the Legendary Pokemon have with the world. *Spoilers* we see later in the game a world where Dialga has reverted to a “primal” state and “time has stopped.” Yet time in certain senses continues, things can happen, nature, the planet, falling rocks, are frozen. Furthermore, time being disrupted caused Dialga to go bad not Dialga ruining time.

Okay.  So.  Time supposedly flows with the beat of Dialga’s heart.  No word on the direction of causality involved there, though.  Does Dialga’s heartbeat cause time to flow, or does the flow of time cause Dialga’s heart to beat?  It’s a trick question, of course, because human conceptions of cause and effect function within a ‘normal’ time stream (whatever that means) – if neither one can possibly come ‘first,’ then neither one can be the ‘cause’ of the other in the sense that we understand the word, so it seems that they just happen together.  If Dialga is alive, time flows, and vice versa.  Any action taken that hurts Dialga is, by its very nature, harmful to the natural passage of time, and anything capable of altering the flow of time is, again by its very nature, harmful to Dialga.

Time, from a human perspective, is basically a way that we have of measuring change.  We invented ways of measuring time in order to keep track of the movement of the earth around the sun.  If time ‘stopped,’ though, every means we could possibly have of measuring time would stop with it, including our thoughts, so realistically, how would we ever know?  It very well could have happened sixteen times before I had breakfast this morning!  Unless there’s some objective way of keeping time which is standard throughout the universe, doesn’t rely on local frames of reference, and keeps changing regardless of any disruptions, the idea of time ‘stopping’ is meaningless anyway.  Dialga’s heartbeat could be that perfectly objective timepiece.  Of course, that would mean that Dialga never really ‘travels’ through time at all, because time itself is defined by Dialga’s lifespan – he’s just aware of, and experiences, every moment of his own existence simultaneously.  Nor does he ‘control’ time, any more than humans can ‘control’ the beating of our hearts – it’s just what he is.

Anonymous asks:

Which came first, the creator or the ancestor? I would appreciate your thoughts on both the question and my theory. My theory is that long before there was stardust and the like there was pure energy, this energy was concentrated on two particular points in this Dimension? These points were constantly traveling and trying to take a physical shape. Eventually the points collided and the result was dormant energy being activated and creating the foundations of what will be our world arceus and mew

Well, my position on this whole mess is tricky because I actually refuse to believe that Mew is the ancestor of all Pokémon.  Scientists in the Pokémon world believe that Mew is the ancestor of all Pokémon because she has the DNA of all known Pokémon species.  They are wrong, however, because that is not how genetics and evolution (of the real-world Darwinian/Mendelian kind) work.  The whole point of evolution is that species change over time and acquire new traits through random mutation, some of which spread because they are useful and allow individuals which possess them to reproduce more effectively.  Things change.  If Mew is the common ancestor of all Pokémon and has the DNA of all modern Pokémon, then that would mean that no viable mutant traits have ever arisen in the history of Pokémon evolution, which is just nuts.  A “common ancestor” of all Pokémon ought to have most of the traits shared by all Pokémon, but none of the traits that make each individual species unique.  Basically I think that, in-universe, the scientists who discovered and described Mew are just completely off-base.  I can’t claim to know what she really is, but I think she’s actually a living genetic library, whose power is to absorb and preserve the DNA of other species, created by Arceus with the purpose of recording the evolutionary history of all Pokémon.

So that’s why I think the whole Arceus/Mew debate is irrelevant anyway.

I think speculating on what the beginning of existence was like in the Pokémon world is likely to be even less productive than speculating on what it was like in the real world, but I will note that your version presupposes the existence of both space (“particular points,” “travelling”) and time (“constantly,” “eventually”), which is a problem because this is all happening before Dialga and Palkia, who are supposed to have been created by Arceus (if the word “before” can even be thought to have any meaning without Dialga).  That, and I’m not sure what this is supposed to tell us.  There was energy, and then there was Arceus.  So what?  What consequences does this have for the way we see Arceus, Mew, or the universe?

Do you think making water pokemon weak to poison type attacks would both improve game balance and be thematically sound? I believe it makes sense since pollution tends to muck up a water’s flow and is a great danger to sea creatures (which most water type pokemon are). And for that matter, why isn’t steel weak to electric? It’s conductive just like water, and it would give electric types more uses and balance out steel’s massive defenses.

On Water/Poison, I agree that it would make at least as much thematic sense as any of the other type matchups in Pokémon, and if you had asked me this a year ago I would have said yes without a second’s thought because Poison-types needed more love (I think I may actually have suggested this change myself at one point).  Today, though… well, Poison has already gotten a boost from being strong against Fairy.  Likewise for Electric/Steel, it would have made sense, but Steel’s just been nerfed by losing its resistances to Dark and Ghost attacks, while Electric-types have just been given immunity to all forms of paralysis.  I’m not prepared to say that these are bad ideas by any stretch of the imagination, but I want to let the new changes settle and rethink my priorities here before I start commenting on more adjustments.

About Accuracy, in Pokemon, moves like Flamethrower are considered entirely superior to moves like Fire Blast because of the later’s chance of missing, but what if these moves balanced more? Take Flame Burst, Flamethrower, and Fire Blast… lets say Flame Burst has less power (50-60) and perfect accuracy, flamethrower has less accuracy (85) same damage, and Fire Blast has the same damage with 70 accuracy. Do you think this would have better trade-offs or be a worse set up?

Well, it’s a little more complicated than that.  I know that Flamethrower and Fire Blast have both been reduced in power slightly in X and Y, and I’m not sure how people are reacting to that, but in the older generations people didn’t consider Flamethrower “entirely superior” at all.  The way it’s generally seen is that by multiplying power by accuracy you can get an estimate of the amount of damage a move will do on average, and if the less accurate move is still stronger, it’s worth it.  Using the 5th generation  numbers, you’ll usually do more damage with Fire Blast: 95 x 100% = 95 for Flamethrower, but 120 x 85% = 102, which is a bit higher (contrast Thunderbolt/Thunder, where Thunder’s much lower 70% accuracy means that, on average, you’ll do more damage with Thunderbolt unless you have rain support – 120 x 70% = 84).  The 6th generation numbers give a similar kind of result.  The reliability of the 100%-accurate moves can be attractive, but more powerful moves also have a better chance to one-shot an opponent, which can be extremely important (and, of course, there are a couple of Pokemon who can learn Flamethrower but not Fire Blast, like Electivire and Zoroark, but they’re kind of a minority).  It’s also much easier to run out of PP when using Fire Blast, especially against opponents with Pressure.  As a result, Fire Blast is generally preferred, but there’s room for personal taste.  Honestly, I’m totally okay with this balance.

The values you suggest give us 60 x 100% = 60 for Flame Burst, 90 x 85% = 76.5 for Flamethrower, and 110 x 70% = 77 for Fire Blast.  Flame Burst is still so much lower that it’s not really worth it, while Flamethrower and Fire Blast get values that are much closer together, so it’s harder to pick a clear winner, but people would probably still use both.  I think making the ‘reliable’ option so much weaker would just make things much more frustrating, to be honest.