You really should be getting paid for this, or be sent freebies by Nintendo, or something. I feel like I have a lot of the same thoughts about the Pokemon universe as you do, but there is no way I could ever get the garble in my head to resemble anything close to coherent in writing, at least not in the small space in time that you manage, and what I have to offer definitely wouldn’t be as entertaining or clever as what you produce. I am so glad you exist!

Heh.  I wish!  I’d be lying if I said I’d never entertained fantasies of being somehow recognised for all this nonsense I produce, but I suspect that most Pokémon fans don’t want what I’m selling (so to speak).  I’m okay with writing for a niche audience, though.  How did Seneca put it again…?  Haec ego non multis, sed tibi; satis enim magnum alter alteri theatrum sumus – I do this not for the many, but for you; for we are a great enough theatre for each other.

The man’s prose is terrifying, but you can’t deny it’s eminently quotable.

Oh my God, your article on genders!!! Sorry, but this stuff makes me so excited. I really, really like the way you think about the Pokémon universe. Have your read the “Theory of Incense Breeding” from The Cave of Dragonflies? You’ll find it very interesting, certainly.

…huh.  Y’know, I had never read that, but it’s almost exactly the same as the explanation I just came up with in response to a question in the comments to my entry on gender.  Well, there you go; it *must* be a reasonable explanation!

(For the interest of other readers, here is a link to the Cave of Dragonflies discussion, the question I was asked, and the answer I gave)

Q: How do you reckon the whole “holding incense” works? Because it seems to be some sort of drug which caused pokemon to form new under-developed species which they previously could not (for example, breeding a sudowoodo in GSC or Emerald would not get you a Bonsly, as rock incense did not exsist).

A: That’s more or less the same explanation I came up with when I tried to puzzle it out, but the idea of deliberately giving a Pokémon drugs that stunt the growth of its offspring is so wildly out of step with the rest of the series that I have trouble accepting it. For an explanation that makes sense from an ecological perspective… it could be that those ‘baby’ forms represent a slower growth to maturity which is, in the long term, healthier for the Pokémon, but also requires greater parental investment in the offspring, and is therefore only suitable in times of conspicuous environmental benevolence. The incense stimulates the Pokémon’s body in the same way as those positive environmental conditions, prompting the release of hormones that cause offspring to develop more slowly.

Im curious to know how you think the creation of a new pokemon works? Or more importantly how you would go about it?

You mean, like, at Game Freak?

Um… good question.

They definitely seem to have a lot of stock ideas, like there’s always a comparatively useless Normal-type based on a small omnivorous mammal, and there’s always a comparatively useless (except Staraptor) Normal/Flying-type based on a generic bird, and there’s often a cute little Electric rodent thingy, and so on… and I guess for those it’s sort of a paint-by-numbers thing, which makes me suspect they have a target number of new Pokémon they want to release in a generation and don’t much care how they get there.  Not that they don’t still have awesome ideas too, of course.

I think sometimes they just go to the zoo or whatever and chill until they see something awesome.  Or read obscure zoology textbooks.  Honestly that seems to me like as good a way as any.  ‘Truth is stranger than fiction,’ so they say, and nowhere is that more the case than in animal biology.  On that note, I find it bizarre that they have yet to concoct a platypus Pokémon (though I suppose one of the stranger things about the platypus is that it lays eggs, which is standard for Pokémon).

Other times they go delving into Japanese folklore, and in my opinion that’s where some of the most fascinating and quirky designs come from.  Whereas designs based on bizarre real animals have the undeniable charm of being weirder than anything a human mind could invent, designs based on folklore have a certain timeless quality to them – myths and monsters persist for a reason; they resonate with certain aspects of our psychology, and when you have such powerful ideas available, why not work with them?  It helps, naturally, that Japan has a long-standing cultural fascination with describing and categorising the otherworldly (which, of course, was one of the major influences on Pokémon from the start).

See, I actually don’t have huge problems with the way Game Freak go about creating new Pokémon.  I think in many ways they’ve got it absolutely right.  I just wouldn’t do as much of it.  I have something of a ‘less is more’ approach to the whole thing.  Given the choice, I would rather do more work with an existing Pokémon and use it to tell more stories than create an all-new one that serves essentially the same purpose.  I also think that a lot of Pokémon would benefit greatly from the added attention.  There are a great many fifth-generation Pokémon that, in my opinion, came so close to getting the whole thing fantastically right – Darmanitan, Braviary, Cryogonal, Heatmor – and it really does pain me that the designers wasted their time on blatant filler like Watchog, Basculin, Unfezant and Emolga when they could have spent it really thinking about some of those others.  I think we have enough Pokémon now that we don’t actually need another 100+ in every generation – I would totally be happy with 30 or 40 if they were all as well-done as, say, Chandelure.

As you might have gathered from that last paragraph, my entries from last year have rather a lot on my thoughts about this if you want more; I hope I’ve managed to explain the main salient points, though.

Apparently, the Trapinch evolutionary line is based off of antlions, a type of insect which gained popularity through the sink hole traps of the larva. Here’s what bugged me, they were classified as Dragons (excluding Trapinch, of course) instead as part Bug. What do you think was the reason for this?

I think they probably started with the idea of a desert dragon, implying a Dragon/Ground type, and only later tried to come up with an unassuming ‘baby’ form for it.  When they did, they eventually settled on Trapinch and then worked the dragonfly aesthetic into the mature designs to build on it.

Also, do notice that they’re in the Bug breeding group, but not the Dragon breeding group.  Although they have many of the traits of Dragon Pokémon and few of the traits of Bug Pokémon, they can breed with most Bug-types, and are presumably more closely related to them than they are to other Dragon-types.

What is your favourite pokemon of each type?

Hmm.  Y’know, I’ve never actually gone through them all and thought about it.  Let’s see…

(For convenience’s sake, I’ll assume that one element is ‘dominant’ for any Pokémon that have two – otherwise, a lot of these will appear twice.  Also, de gustibus non disputandum – these are my personal favourites, and not the ones I necessarily think have the best or most interesting designs and concepts, though there is naturally some overlap.)

Grass – my favourite Pokémon of all is, and has always been, Vileplume, whom I consider to be in many ways the archetypal Grass Pokémon: peaceful, tranquil, but able to hit back with downright sadistic disabling attacks when provoked.

Fire – Ninetales, elegant, clever, enigmatic, and terrifyingly vengeful – reminds me of a Greek goddess.  I’ve always had a soft spot for Camerupt too.

Ground – Marowak.  What can I say?  I like darker takes on Pokémon, and Marowak is one of the cooler ones.

Poison – Mmm… probably Nidoqueen; a mother’s love, wrapped up in a battle-tank body.

Electric – Ampharos.  This is the GSC nostalgia talking; I’m not even going to try to deny it.

Water – My favourite is Milotic, but there are a lot of other Water-types I love as well; Starmie, Carracosta, Kingdra, Relicanth, Octillery, Gastrodon… I could go on.

Rock – Hmm.  This one’s tough, but I’m probably going to go with Rampardos, partly because dinosaurs are awesome and partly because, like I always say, there’s no ‘kill’ like overkill.

Flying – I’ve never been much of a Flying-type kind of dude… probably Archeops, with an honourable mention to Tropius for having such a crazy awesome design.

Ice – Froslass, who does the whole ‘mysterious wandering spirit’ thing so very, very well.

Normal – There are so many it’s hard to choose, but I’m going to go with Dunsparce, because Dunsparce needs more love.

Bug – mmm… tricky… I want to say Venomoth, but I’m also very tempted by Masquerain and Galvantula, both of whom I think have really interesting designs… call this one a three-way tie.

Ghost – Spiritomb, who is literally made of the imprisoned souls of 108 unrepentant murderers, has always been the one for me.

Fighting – Mienshao, hands down, for totally redefining how Game Freak design Fighting-types.

Dragon – Am I allowed to say Kingdra?  Eh, she already got a mention… let’s go with Flygon, because Flygon is awesome.

Psychic – Sigilyph.  The archaeology fanboy in me just can’t go past this one.

Dark – Houndoom, probably, with Umbreon and Absol a close second and third.

Steel – Bronzong, just for being friggin’ indestructible.

Has Pokemon ever helped you to understand anything outside the video game-centric world, like with school, with your friends, or anything beyond video games?

Y’know, I wish I could tell a nice inspiring story about this, but… no… not really, no.

I suppose in a general sense it’s part of the whole 90’s cultural mishmash that I was brought up in, with all that that implies – the importance of equality, emphasis on a person’s ‘inner beauty,’ a generally positive but cautious attitude to technology, the value of friendship… all those things have shaped the way I think, to an extent, but no, I don’t think my actions in any one situation have been informed by Pokémon specifically.  Honestly, it’s more the other way around, like I was saying in my last post – my life experiences and worldview shape the way I think about Pokémon, and fiction in general.

Do you have any thoughts/rantings on the fact that Gamefreak are intent on favouring certain type combinations? It was only recently that I realised that Bug/Steel has been reincarnated 5 or so times, and it really got on my nerves for some reason. I mean, I understand that Normal/Flying or Grass/Poison often go hand-in-hand, but it makes me feel like there’s a huge area of untapped potential that is always overlooked. What is your opinion?

Y’know, I can totally give you a reading list for that.

http://pokemaniacal.tumblr.com/post/17760664957/pidove-tranquill-and-unfezant
http://pokemaniacal.tumblr.com/post/17760683982/rufflet-and-braviary 
http://pokemaniacal.tumblr.com/post/17760675914/larvesta-and-volcarona  
http://pokemaniacal.tumblr.com/post/17760669001/tympole-palpitoad-and-seismitoad
http://pokemaniacal.tumblr.com/post/17760670559/mienfoo-and-mienshao

The first one is probably the most relevant but they should all give you a pretty good idea of my general thoughts.

In brief: yes.  Oh, dear gods, yes. 

Your anon who mentioned rivals I agree with. Also I look forward to that. I know it’s been a meme, but I want to see if we can draw some real evidence, that in the games, Green/Blue/Gary is actually a kid who has it as bad as the memes have claimed him to. Not to mention Silver, I haven’t gotten far enough into mangas to know his story, but he has been such a mystery for so long.

Well, I don’t know anything about the manga, but Blue in the games is a total jerk.  I don’t really think you can rehabilitate him at all.  Also, I kinda think I said everything I care to say about him in my Champions series, so I probably won’t cover him again when I do the rivals.

Silver, though… Silver really fascinates me.  He has actual, honest-to-goodness character development!  Actually, Silver is practically the whole reason I want to do a series on the rivals; I think he’s far and away the most interesting.  Well, unless you count N, which I think I might.  Hmm.

The rivals of the various games are worth a post or two i feel. They honestly have quite alot of interesting features that id love to here your point of view on.

It’s on the list – along with Eeveelutions, the top ten creepiest Pokemon, a playthrough journal of Black/White 2, more anime, a series of unstructured ramblings entitled “If I Were In Charge,” and a history of Kanto.

Basically I have a tonne of stuff I want to write, and I promise I’ll get around to it all eventually. 🙂