I saw a few recent questions about some of the “god” (well, your thoughts on them), and I thought I’d pick your mind on one of the ones that has baffled me since I first saw it: Giratina. Dialga is time, Palkia is space, and Giratina is… Antimatter? I mean, I know what antimatter is (to an extent, I mean, even scientists are trying to figure that one out), but what exactly is Giratina’s function? What is the “Reverse World”? What do you think would happen if he no longer existed?

The way Giratina is described in Diamond and Pearl always had me thinking of it as a death god figure, kind of like Hades in Greek mythology – dark and terrifying, but not actually evil, and in fact vital to the maintenance of cosmic order.  The way Platinum portrays it (mostly in Cynthia’s speculation) seems to be saying that Giratina basically maintains the Distortion World as a ‘photo negative’ of the real world that can be used to restore any damage done to it on a cosmic level, which is why Cyrus’ attempts to take apart reality in Platinum fail.  If memory serves, the game uses the analogy of DNA, which has a similar system going on (errors can be detected because the two strands no longer match up right).  As for what would happen if the Distortion World no longer existed… well, I think that’s asking the wrong question.  Logically, it would be possible to use the ‘real’ world to repair or rebuild the Distortion World in just the same way.  The only way to destroy one would be to take apart both at the same time (as Cyrus attempts to do).

Basically, Giratina is kind of important for maintaining the stability of reality, as the caretaker of the Distortion World.  The Pokédex says that it was “banished for its violence” but I actually don’t think that’s true, because Arceus (presumably) has given it a vital role in the cosmology of the Pokémon universe.  Of course, as frightening as Giratina is, it makes sense that humans who encountered it might get the wrong idea about its nature and powers, hence the whole ‘death god’ thing.

What if Dialga has a less control oriented relationship with time? In Mystery Dungeon Time and Darkness, the games sorta explore the different relationships the Legendary Pokemon have with the world. *Spoilers* we see later in the game a world where Dialga has reverted to a “primal” state and “time has stopped.” Yet time in certain senses continues, things can happen, nature, the planet, falling rocks, are frozen. Furthermore, time being disrupted caused Dialga to go bad not Dialga ruining time.

Okay.  So.  Time supposedly flows with the beat of Dialga’s heart.  No word on the direction of causality involved there, though.  Does Dialga’s heartbeat cause time to flow, or does the flow of time cause Dialga’s heart to beat?  It’s a trick question, of course, because human conceptions of cause and effect function within a ‘normal’ time stream (whatever that means) – if neither one can possibly come ‘first,’ then neither one can be the ‘cause’ of the other in the sense that we understand the word, so it seems that they just happen together.  If Dialga is alive, time flows, and vice versa.  Any action taken that hurts Dialga is, by its very nature, harmful to the natural passage of time, and anything capable of altering the flow of time is, again by its very nature, harmful to Dialga.

Time, from a human perspective, is basically a way that we have of measuring change.  We invented ways of measuring time in order to keep track of the movement of the earth around the sun.  If time ‘stopped,’ though, every means we could possibly have of measuring time would stop with it, including our thoughts, so realistically, how would we ever know?  It very well could have happened sixteen times before I had breakfast this morning!  Unless there’s some objective way of keeping time which is standard throughout the universe, doesn’t rely on local frames of reference, and keeps changing regardless of any disruptions, the idea of time ‘stopping’ is meaningless anyway.  Dialga’s heartbeat could be that perfectly objective timepiece.  Of course, that would mean that Dialga never really ‘travels’ through time at all, because time itself is defined by Dialga’s lifespan – he’s just aware of, and experiences, every moment of his own existence simultaneously.  Nor does he ‘control’ time, any more than humans can ‘control’ the beating of our hearts – it’s just what he is.

Anonymous asks:

Which came first, the creator or the ancestor? I would appreciate your thoughts on both the question and my theory. My theory is that long before there was stardust and the like there was pure energy, this energy was concentrated on two particular points in this Dimension? These points were constantly traveling and trying to take a physical shape. Eventually the points collided and the result was dormant energy being activated and creating the foundations of what will be our world arceus and mew

Well, my position on this whole mess is tricky because I actually refuse to believe that Mew is the ancestor of all Pokémon.  Scientists in the Pokémon world believe that Mew is the ancestor of all Pokémon because she has the DNA of all known Pokémon species.  They are wrong, however, because that is not how genetics and evolution (of the real-world Darwinian/Mendelian kind) work.  The whole point of evolution is that species change over time and acquire new traits through random mutation, some of which spread because they are useful and allow individuals which possess them to reproduce more effectively.  Things change.  If Mew is the common ancestor of all Pokémon and has the DNA of all modern Pokémon, then that would mean that no viable mutant traits have ever arisen in the history of Pokémon evolution, which is just nuts.  A “common ancestor” of all Pokémon ought to have most of the traits shared by all Pokémon, but none of the traits that make each individual species unique.  Basically I think that, in-universe, the scientists who discovered and described Mew are just completely off-base.  I can’t claim to know what she really is, but I think she’s actually a living genetic library, whose power is to absorb and preserve the DNA of other species, created by Arceus with the purpose of recording the evolutionary history of all Pokémon.

So that’s why I think the whole Arceus/Mew debate is irrelevant anyway.

I think speculating on what the beginning of existence was like in the Pokémon world is likely to be even less productive than speculating on what it was like in the real world, but I will note that your version presupposes the existence of both space (“particular points,” “travelling”) and time (“constantly,” “eventually”), which is a problem because this is all happening before Dialga and Palkia, who are supposed to have been created by Arceus (if the word “before” can even be thought to have any meaning without Dialga).  That, and I’m not sure what this is supposed to tell us.  There was energy, and then there was Arceus.  So what?  What consequences does this have for the way we see Arceus, Mew, or the universe?

Hi, I was thinking about Reshiram and Zekrom. It took me several minutes to remember which one stood for truth and which for ideals, does this happen to you? Do you think it’s a design flaw and how would you fix it?

I thought about this quite a bit when I was writing about Black and White, and when I reviewed the Victini movie.  In both the games and the movie, Reshiram and Zekrom are basically interchangeable, as are their values.  This is necessary so that the same story can be told whichever one N partners with, and is made possible largely because the writers seem to have a very loose interpretation of what ‘truth’ is.  I think this is the real problem, rather than anything in their physical designs; both Reshiram’s ‘truth’ and Zekrom’s ‘ideals’ basically boil down to “the way you believe in your heart the world should be,” so there’s nothing to distinguish them conceptually.  Zekrom stands for ideals and Reshiram stands for truth, but ultimately both of them admire and reward the same things in their human partners: the desire for change, and the will to pursue it.  Honestly, I don’t think they’re forces of ‘truth’ and ‘ideals’ at all; I think they personify conflict itself in a way so abstract and primal that our pathetic little human minds just give up and start arbitrarily assigning them to pairs of opposites like light and dark, male and female, or passion and serenity, in an effort to explain their nature in terms we can understand.  Since playing the sequels I’ve actually come to think that the fuzziness of their boundaries is intentional; you can see this, for instance, when you meet Drayden in the sequels and he talks about how, in spite of their long-standing and bitter opposition, Reshiram and Zekrom aren’t even all that different, and don’t really need to be enemies at all.  I think the fact that you have difficulty remembering which is which is sort of the point; the whole thing, I suspect, is supposed to be an allegory for the wastefulness of conflict.

All that said, I don’t really like the way Reshiram and Zekrom were handled.  If I had been running Black and White, I probably would have demanded significantly more divergence between the two games in the way the story unfolded, to give room for Reshiram and Zekrom to look for and cultivate different qualities in their chosen heroes – Reshiram respects intelligence, discipline, pragmatism and an analytical worldview, while Zekrom respects confidence, passion, determination and an idealistic worldview.  N could actually fit either of these – he can earn Zekrom’s trust through his desire to change the world for the better and his dedication to his cause, while he can command Reshiram’s respect through his undeniable brilliance and his ability to view the world with mathematical objectivity.  I think I would probably work this by playing up different aspects of N’s personality on the different games, to make it more obvious how he fits each dragon.  Then, starting from the point when the player obtains the Light Stone or Dark Stone (which I might put earlier in the game), Reshiram/Zekrom will begin sending the player visions or dreams that require difficult moral choices (“who do you save and why?”-type dilemmas with no ‘right’ option, both choices leading to a different explanation from the dragon about why you suck), basically with the intention of moulding you into a hero who suits their preferences.

Favourite X and Y Pokemon so far? Also, be patient with Skrelp… He evolves very late; I believe level 49?

Hmm… that’s a tough one.  I think at the moment it might be Inkay, for having such an offbeat fighting style and being so ridiculously cute, as well as daring to be a sea creature that isn’t a Water-type.  I also have a major soft spot for Amaura and Aurorus, for reasons of dinosaurs, and I kinda like Goomy for being such a weird Dragon-type, but I’m waiting for the final evolution to make up my mind about that.

So I feel like Stantler is one of those Pokemon Gamefreak doesn’t care about. It’s normal-type, and weaker that other similar Pokemon like Tauros, so I wanted to come up with an exclusive move and am curious about what you think. The move is called Doom Bell, where Stantler vibrates its horns to release an eerie tone that will faint the opponent if Stantler isn’t knocked out before the end of the turn. The move can only have 3 PP and fails if the opponent is switched in during that turn.

Hmm.

It’s… kind of an all-or-nothing tactic?  Like, in theory, a Stantler with a Focus Sash can kill absolutely anything with this move, barring entry hazards, weather damage and multi-hit attacks, which strikes me as a terrible thing to give to any Pokémon.  The smart thing for the opponent to do is always to switch out against Stantler until it runs out of Doom Bell PP – which means that the smart thing for Stantler to do is never actually to use Doom Bell, and instead to exploit the fact that very few Pokémon will willingly stay in against it by spamming Calm Mind or Thunder Wave.  You get this irritating game of chicken, where Stantler is daring an opponent to stay in, try to kill him, and risk being Doom Belled, and the opponent is daring Stantler to use Doom Bell and risk running out of PP for it without killing anything.  Worse, it’s clearly a very good idea for Stantler with this move to have Substitute as well – so the opponent is in a situation where they can either switch out and risk letting Stantler set up a free Substitute, making him even more annoying to deal with, or not switch out and risk instant death.  I actually think a lot of Stantler might wind up not having Doom Bell at all – just something along the lines of [Calm Mind | Psyshock | Thunderbolt | Substitute/Energy Ball], keeping one of the attacks secret until very late in the game, and just exploiting the fear of the possibility of Doom Bell, since optimal tactics for the damn thing involve not using it.  I’m… not convinced it’s a good idea.

If it’s any consolation, Stantler’s not… that bad.  His movepool is solid and he has two great abilities; his stats are just a bit lacklustre.

Also… why a bell?  As far as I know Stantler doesn’t have any sonic powers or any flavour related to bells or ringing… he doesn’t even learn Heal Bell.

Perhaps something along the lines of telescoping generations in aphids? Some species reproduce asexually as well as sexually- females are born pregnant with a genetically identical daughter, and that unborn daughter is already developing a daughter of her own. When mating with males, they lay eggs which can hatch into either males or females. Maybe each newly hatched Kangaskid is already parthenogenically pregnant and gives birth when she becomes Kangaskhan offscreen.

Well, that seems to be more or less what happens, except that there are no male Kangaskhan, which would mean that actual Kangaskhan eggs are a weird anomaly that only ever happen with hybrids, and most of them just clone themselves ad infinitum.  They’re just… kind of a strange species.

I have a theory about why Kangaskhan has a baby in its pouch as soon as it’s born. When a Kangaskhan egg hatches, the baby inside replaces the one in the Kangaskhan’s pouch, while the one previously in the pouch instantly matures into an adult Kangaskhan, complete with baby in pouch. Baby Kangaskhans themselves are simply multicellular versions of egg cells and get genetic information from the father through the mother Kangaskhan’s milk. Thus all Kangaskhan are perpetual mothers. Your thoughts?

So… what you’re saying is that the egg doesn’t actually hatch into a Kangaskhan at all; it hatches into a ‘Kangaskid’ or whatever you want to call it, and that prompts an existing Kangaskid to leave its mother’s pouch and ‘evolve’ (offscreen, as it were) into an adult Kangaskhan, producing another Kangaskid in the process?

It’s… an interesting idea; the trouble is that, in the games, there doesn’t actually need to be another Kangaskhan present in order for an egg to hatch.  You can be wandering around with nothing in your party but a Kangaskhan egg and, say, a Magcargo, and when the egg hatches, you’ll still get a complete set of Kangaskhan + baby (in the anime, on the other hand, there’s nothing all that unusual about seeing a Kangaskhan without a baby, so there’s nothing that needs to be explained anyway).

You know what bothers me? Cherubi. The Cherry Pokémon. But, aren’t Cheri Berries the Pokémon world equivalent to cherries? Just like they don’t have cats, just Meowths, Skitties, etc. (Of course, Meowth’s the “Scratch Cat” Pokémon, Pikachu is an “Electric Mouse”, but in my head, “fish” is just their general therm for Pokémon with specific characteristics, and so are “cat”, “mouse” etc. Pikachu is an electric mouse, while Ratatta is a normal mouse…)

Would it help if they started calling it “the Cheri Pokémon"?

I would just like to say I am so glad someone picks apart those annoying incomplete things (the legendary family tree) also which of the “rodent” Pokemon do you think is best? Or it’d be really cool if you pick apart each because you’re awesome.

I assume you mean by this Rattata, Sentret, Zigzagoon, Bidoof and Patrat?  Hmm… Well, Patrat has those crazy eyes, and I’m pretty sure it’s some kind of demon-thing.  It scares me.  I think Rattata is just a really big purple rat; like, I’m pretty sure it doesn’t do anything that a normal rat doesn’t.  Bidoof is Bidoof.  Zigzagoon has the zigzag thing, which I guess is kind of interesting.  I suppose I quite like Sentret.  It’s a meerkat, only it’s not, because it’s also a bit like a whole bunch of animals.  It’s not just an animal that’s been pasted into the game with minimal thought or development.  Also there is that episode of the anime where a Sentret hijacks Team Rocket’s giant Arbok-shaped destructo-tank, possibly the most ludicrous device they have ever deployed (which is saying something), and goes on a rampage.  That was, on reflection, pretty awesome.